Everyone has an opinion on the tariffs, their purpose, whether they make sense, and ultimately, their effects. How can we navigate these issues effectively when so much political emotion is wrapped in those opinions? Returning to first principles and a grounding in the basics helps us all sort out the signal from the noise.
CEW introduced its College Payoff Report in 2011. They established that, on average, higher education pays off with substantially higher lifetime earnings than those without college credentials. It has been a mainstay support in the argument over higher education value. Why then the growing skepticism, did they get it right?
The latest news reports suggest Apple intends to source US phone supply in India to reduce tariff effects. Naturally, this news has attracted negative analyst coverage. The most bearish says it probably won’t work well and reduced his stock price target to the lowest of all analysts. Is he right, or missing the big picture?
US policymakers regularly criticize Europe’s Value-Added Tax (VAT) refund system, arguing it tilts trade dynamics in favor of European producers. European counterparts counter with a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling that deems VAT refunds for exporters non-subsidies, suggesting compliance with global trade norms. Yet, does technical legality equate to equitable outcomes? Can the system lead to undesirable effects?
The market assumed Apple was in trouble with Tariffs. At one point last week, it traded as low as $172 per share, a 34% drop from its peak. That price drop is building in massive pessimism around the business. Here is why that doomsday view is overdone.
Georgetown University CEW introduced its first try at calculating college ROI in 2019. Did they get it right?